what are some major changes during these years that i was completely in the dark about?
these are the years that i was in.
I thought the 1995 change was from generation that saw and understood the events in 1914 to the era that has features of the last days in it, like a lot of violence and earthquakes. However long that era lasts doesn't matter. Just that time with those events in them is important. Boy, did I misunderstand that change of prophecy.
So, how is it that it's the bad guys? I'm confused.
what are some major changes during these years that i was completely in the dark about?
these are the years that i was in.
What are some major changes during these years that I was completely in the dark about? These are the years that I was in.
someone told me there is suppose to be some announcement after the wt next week, anyone hear of this?
1. It gives us something else to make fun of about them.
2. It reassures us that we made the right decision in leaving because they keep changing major teachings. It does reassure me when they do this.
3. Can't think of a 3rd, but reasons always come in 3's, don't they?
as i am a relative newcomer, i don't know what has been posted before so i apologise if you've already seen this....... .
hell explained by a chemistry student.
the following is an actual question given on a university ofwashington chemistry mid term.. .
Hahaha! This is really good!
i have read through many posts on this website that refer to the fact wtbts changed their viewpoint on generation and its relevance to 1914. there was just an article out in the wt (last six months) that reiterated the fact this viewpoint did not change, and that the wtbts still expects the generation who were around in 1914 to physically see the conclusion of this system and the visible second coming of jesus here on earth.
the wtbts did state they consider anyone being born in 1914 would be applicable, which is a change from earlier discussions, but they have not (from what i have seen) said that generation could pass away altogether.
sincerely i ask: if anyone has that information i would love to see it.
BFD,
Play nice, now. No throwing sand in jonny's face. That's not nice.
i have read through many posts on this website that refer to the fact wtbts changed their viewpoint on generation and its relevance to 1914. there was just an article out in the wt (last six months) that reiterated the fact this viewpoint did not change, and that the wtbts still expects the generation who were around in 1914 to physically see the conclusion of this system and the visible second coming of jesus here on earth.
the wtbts did state they consider anyone being born in 1914 would be applicable, which is a change from earlier discussions, but they have not (from what i have seen) said that generation could pass away altogether.
sincerely i ask: if anyone has that information i would love to see it.
Yeah, I'm kind of confused on this point, as well. I know that in 1995 people generation changed to era generation. They removed the genes from gene-ration. Totally illogical. What have they done recently?
we read, write and shed tears over the plight of sexually abused girls & boys.
they suffer at the hands of not only authority figures like elders, priests, teachers, but also relatives and of course, strangers.. but, reading the following story is even, if possible, more chilling.
state sponsored child abuse!
I can't even begin to imagine her terror being ripped from her family and forced to live with a destroyer.
i, as most persons, think a sexual assault of a child is a very horrible thing.
like most parents, i would want to put the person to death that assaulted my child in that way, but is that just?
i'm two ways about it: i feel for the child, and the child's family; but at the same time i am wondering if it is deserving of death?
Know why veternarians won't use the same cocktail on animals to put them to sleep? It's cruel and unusual punishment. The first drug paralyzes you and the other two stop your heart and is suppose to numb your brain. It's excrutiating pain for minutes. C&UP is unconstitutional so why does the Virginia (or WV) Supreme Court uphold it?
i, as most persons, think a sexual assault of a child is a very horrible thing.
like most parents, i would want to put the person to death that assaulted my child in that way, but is that just?
i'm two ways about it: i feel for the child, and the child's family; but at the same time i am wondering if it is deserving of death?
It costs millions to execute someone. It costs thousands to house them in prison. PM me with "why's that so?" I expect that most people know why. Also, people change and can help others rehabilitate in prison. Innocent people are on death row. No on the death penalty.
disclaimer: this video may scare you very much.
it is not for the faint hearted.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdgceskcy60.
I laughed until I cried! So funny!
